First as tragedy, then as farce

History can be a depressing mistress sometimes. Most people will be familiar with an expression attributed to Marx, that history repeats itself “the first as tragedy, the second as farce.” In fact, Marx was quoting Hegel and referring specifically to “great world-historic facts and personages, but it’s still held to be true. Even Slavoj Zizek says so, and you wouldn’t want to argue with such a forceful beard.

However, life is often more complicated than that. As a historian whose research includes the Irish immigration and settlement in the UK in the nineteenth century, I’ve often been saddened by the all-too-familiar rhetoric wielded around today’s poor migrants. Two events of the last weekend have suggested to me that Marx could sometimes have stood to reverse his aphorism; the repeat is not always the farce.

From Irish Apes: Tactics of De-Humanisation

From Irish Apes: Tactics of De-Humanisation

One of the most interesting books I’ve read of late is LP Curtis’ Apes & Angels (1971). It tells the story of the representation of the Irishman in popular cartoons, tracking the changes from the daft Paddy of the early nineteenth century, to amore “prognathous”, i.e. ape-like character as fears grow over the migratory influx, to the hirsute, threatening character of the later century when Fenianism and terrorism start to find a place in British politics. In a world of Graham NortonSt Patrick’s parades and twenty years of Father Ted, where the Irish are far more celebrated in Britain than mistrusted, these pictures are shocking. ‘Racist’ hardly seems to cover it, and indeed the feeling went far deeper than cartoons. The Irish were abused for their perceived racial inferiority (to the burgeoning master race of the British, of course); mistrusted for their ‘Papism’, exploited as the lowest-paid workers; and resented by workers for taking their jobs. The Irish were de-humanised to society in this way, presented as figures worthy of comic abuse – farce, if you like.

From Irish Political Cartoons Fancy: characterising human beings as something sub-human just because they dare to be foreign. 100 years ago (pre-Irish independence) it was deemed within the realms of decency to describe the Irish as apes; given what the human race has been through since then, it doesn’t seem like much progress when today’s migrants can be described as cockroaches, or as a virus. Yet those are the expressions that have been used in the best-selling newspaper in the country to describe the refugees seeking asylum in Europe, away from the tragedies of their own nations. Virus! Might as well call them “the very pests of society.

Images of overcrowded boats lost in the Mediterranean have been on our news for some time now, with something like 700 lives lost in one go just yesterday. Katie Hopkins called for gunships rather than transport ships for the migrants. Zoe William’s perceptive piece in the Guardian has perhaps the most tragic take on this: “her idea proved unnecessary, of course.” Williams compares Hopkins’ language to that used in 1994 in Rwanda, when Tutsis were described as “cockroaches.” We can think further back to other times in the last century when human beings were considered less than human. Further back than that and we can think of our Irish friends again, fleeing tragedy and starvation in their own country, this time on vastly-overcrowded boats, crossing dangerous waters. Perhaps it won’t be long till we’re referring to the boats fleeing North Africa and the Middle East as “coffin ships.

History repeats itself, certainly. But if the Louis Bonaparte that Marx was describing could be thought of as a farce, these events suggest that tragedy is often the true result of history repeating.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Irish, Representation and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to First as tragedy, then as farce

  1. Dexter Fox says:

    A fantastic quote from Marx’s The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte, he say “Caussidiere for Danton, Louis Blanc for Robespierre, the “Mountain” of 1848-51 for the “Mountain” of 1793-05, the Nephew for the Uncle.” Bush for Obama, etc.
    Read here:
    https://www.gutenberg.org/files/1346/1346-h/1346-h.htm
    “Hegel says somewhere that that great historic facts and personages recur twice. He forgot to add: “Once as tragedy, and again as farce.” Caussidiere for Danton, Louis Blanc for Robespierre, the “Mountain” of 1848-51 for the “Mountain” of 1793-05, the Nephew for the Uncle. The identical caricature marks also the conditions under which the second edition of the eighteenth Brumaire is issued.
    Man makes his own history, but he does not make it out of the whole cloth; he does not make it out of conditions chosen by himself, but out of such as he finds close at hand. The tradition of all past generations weighs like an alp upon the brain of the living.”

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Dexter Fox says:

    Reblogged this on Ideological Hegemony and commented:
    Tragedy and Farce, Bush and Obama

    Like

  3. Excellent post, and “Apes & Angels” is a great book.

    I thought I lived in an era where you couldn’t publicly compare immigrants to cockroaches, but apparently I was wrong.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s